Re: exists does not autovivify

[Joshua N Pritikin <joshua.pritikin@db.com>]

On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 02:50:04PM -0700, tchrist@chthon.perl.com wrote:
> >Speaking for weirdness, is anyone else concerned with the autovivication
> >of intermediate steps of exists()?  My expectation has always been that
> >exists() does not autovivify.  Once the behavior is documented, then it
> >will be more difficult to fix later.
> 
> It *is* already documented.  

Drat.  Ah well...

-- 
"Does `competition' have an abstract purpose?"
       via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank

---

References to:

Tom Christiansen <tchrist@chthon.perl.com>

---

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]

---