[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]

Re: protected.pm (more Class::Fields)



>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 03:29:13 -0500, Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com> said:

 > Right now I honestly think I'm the only
 > person on p5p using fields -and- pseudo-hashes in a production
 > environment and on a large scale.

Nope, I'm doing so as well.

>> Maybe there ought to be some sort of a expiry date on the "experimental"
>> stuff.  If something doesn't pass the experimental stages for a couple
>> of major release cycles, perhaps it should be thrown out altogether.
>> What say?

I'm a bit surprised that base and fields stuff is experimental. Both
were in 5.005_03 and I see nothing in the documentation of 5.00503
that marks them experimental (Checked pods of base.pm, fields.pm,
perldelta.pod). Am I blind?

-- 
andreas


Follow-Ups from:
Gurusamy Sarathy <gsar@activestate.com>
Martyn Pearce <m.pearce@inpharmatica.co.uk>
References to:
Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>
Gurusamy Sarathy <gsar@ActiveState.com>
Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]