Re: inherted overload & mixed type operations

[Marc Lehmann <marc@gimp.org>]

On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 03:24:30PM +1300, Christian Soeller <c.soeller@auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> I don't think that's quite true. perldoc overload tells you how to do
> it.

I stand corrected. However, I still cannot augment functionality, since I
have no (documented) way to get the previous definitions, so I need knowledge
about the internals of PDL that would like to not require. This internal
changes (that do not change the publsihed interface) would require changes in
my module, which should not be required.

I also do not like punishing every multiplicaiton even when no complex
number is ever going to be used. That reminds me of $&...

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@opengroup.org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

---

Follow-Ups from:

Ilya Zakharevich <ilya@math.ohio-state.edu>

References to:

Marc Lehmann <marc@gimp.org>
Ilya Zakharevich <ilya@math.ohio-state.edu>
Marc Lehmann <marc@gimp.org>
Ilya Zakharevich <ilya@math.ohio-state.edu>
Marc Lehmann <marc@gimp.org>
Ilya Zakharevich <ilya@math.ohio-state.edu>
Marc Lehmann <marc@gimp.org>
Christian Soeller <c.soeller@auckland.ac.nz>

---

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]

---