[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]

Re: exists &sub (was: exists $foo[7] and delete $foo[7])



Tom Christiansen writes:
: >Is C<exists &sub> something we should add?  Why?  If so, should
: >it be for 5.6?
: 
: Um, weren't we in feature-freeze yet?

It's more of a feature-slush yet, but it is getting colder as the days
go by.  I can let lexically scoped subs go till 5.7, sigh, but the utf8
stuff and all its attendant I/O ramifications needs to go in there now,
and we really have to nail down the threading stuff a little better
this time, or our names shall be forever smirched, at least temporarily.

Larry


Follow-Ups from:
Gurusamy Sarathy <gsar@ActiveState.com>
References to:
Tom Christiansen <tchrist@chthon.perl.com>

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]